Frigid temperatures this weekend prompt cold weather advisories

MPR News helps you turn down the noise and build shared understanding. Turn up your support for this public resource and keep trusted journalism accessible to all. 

Turn Up Your Support

Gov. Mark Dayton and Lt. Gov. Tina Smith both expressed concern Friday about a Mayo Clinic policy that in some cases 

gives priority to privately insured patients

Both officials expressed support for the Department of Human Services' review of the policy. DHS Commissioner Emily Piper has said she will investigate whether Mayo's plans violate civil- or human-rights laws.

"It really astonished me. It's so contrary to what I know about Mayo," said Dayton, who recently 

DHS questions whether Mayo policy violates law

The Human Services Department is also reviewing contracts the state has with the clinic.

a letter on Friday with list of detailed questions

 to find out how widespread the practice is and whether the policy has had negative impacts on patients. It seeks a response from the clinic within two weeks. 

Mayo said Friday that about half the clinic's service is to patients with government insurance, and they're committed to serving those patients.

The clinic said it needs more privately insured patients to keep subsidizing patients whose insurance doesn't cover their cost of care.

Smith chairs the board of the Destination Medical Center, a 

20-year, multibillion dollar economic development effort

 to remake downtown Rochester and attract top talent and more patients to Mayo Clinic.


She would not say whether Mayo's policy would affect state support for the Destination Medical Center.


"We need to look into exactly what Mayo is doing," Smith said. "It is unacceptable that an organization that is benefiting so greatly from the strength of Minnesota, they also need to accept their responsibilities for treating everybody in Minnesota."

In a series of statements over the course of the week Mayo officials have emphasized they've provided health services worth over $2 billion to Medicaid, Medicare and uninsured patients that were unreimbursed. 

On Friday, Mayo Clinic CEO Dr. John Noseworthy softened his language. He said he regrets using the word "prioritize" in the video, and that concerns that Mayo will not serve patients with government insurance couldn't be "further from the truth."

The statement also said that Minnesota Medicaid patients are and will continue to be scheduled the same as patients with commercial insurance.

Asked whether Mayo was rolling back the policy Noseworthy outlined, a spokeswoman emailed, "Minnesota Medicaid patients have always been, and will continue to, have the same access as patients with commercial insurance."

There's little dispute that government programs don't pay as well as private insurance. Dayton is asking the Legislature to boost the Medicaid reimbursement rate by 5 percent. 

Still, it is unusual for a high ranking hospital official to speak widely about the issue, in this case, to Mayo's 30,000 plus employees. 

The effect of reimbursement rates for government programs has gotten more complex since the adoption of the Affordable Care Act. Like many states, Minnesota expanded the number of people who are on Medicaid, and meanwhile, baby boomers are aging into Medicare. 

That means lots of hospitals are seeing more publicly insured patients. On the other hand, research suggests hospitals in states with Medicaid expansions are getting stiffed less because more people have insurance.  

Health

Politics and Government News

NewsPartners

Catharine Richert

Author

"It really astonished me," Gov. Mark Dayton said of the clinic's move to grant privately insured patients priority over people on public programs. State officials are investigating whether the clinic's policy violates the law.

Dayton concerned by Mayo Clinic favoring privately insured patients

Go Deeper.

Like this?