ACLU leads challenge to voter ID amendment in court today

Caucus straw polls
Henry Stachyra Jr. waits for caucus participants at Rutherford Elementary School in Stillwater, Minn. Tuesday, Feb. 7, 2012. A voter identification scanning system was being tested at the Stillwater site.
MPR Photo/Jeffrey Thompson

The Minnesota Supreme Court will hear arguments Tuesday afternoon in a lawsuit aimed at keeping the voter ID constitutional amendment off of the statewide ballot.

The American Civil Liberties Union of Minnesota, League of Women Voters Minnesota and other anti-amendment groups are asking the court to strike down the ballot question. They claim its wording is too vague and misleading.

Chuck Samuelson, executive director of the ACLU Minnesota, said the amendment would do far more than require voters to show photo identification at the polls.

"It almost certainly would eliminate absentee voting. It almost certainly would eliminate the ability of service men and women overseas to vote. It discriminates against people who don't have drivers licenses," he said.

Create a More Connected Minnesota

MPR News is your trusted resource for the news you need. With your support, MPR News brings accessible, courageous journalism and authentic conversation to everyone - free of paywalls and barriers. Your gift makes a difference.

But photo ID supporters argue the lawsuit is without merit. Lawyers representing the state Legislature will defend the Republican-backed amendment during the court hearing.

Dan McGrath of pro-amendment group Minnesota Majority said the question is fine the way it is.

"The Legislature, when posing a ballot question to the people, essentially has to frame it as a one sentence question. And the the essence of the amendment is conveyed in that sentence as they posed it," he said.

Secretary of State Mark Ritchie has said a court ruling is needed by Aug. 27 to accommodate the printing of ballots.