Gun control bills differ on universal background checks

Waiting in line
Attendees of a gun control hearing wait with their tickets, which were required to enter because of the high public interest, at the state Capitol in St. Paul, Minn. Thursday, Feb. 21, 2013. The Senate Judiciary Committee, chaired by DFL Sen. Ron Latz, heard testimony on several gun-related bills.
MPR Photo/Jeffrey Thompson

The gun control debate continues this week at the Capitol with a DFL legislator planning to introduce a bill that will not include universal background checks for gun sales.

Supporters of universal background checks say they are needed because 40 percent of all gun sales in the country take place without a background check. The statistic comes from the National Survey on the Ownership of Firearms conducted in 1994. Some gun rights advocates, however, dispute this widely quoted number.

The study was commissioned by the National Institute of Justice and conducted by Chilton Research Services of Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania. Researchers conducted a phone survey of more than 2,500 adults and asked them several questions about their guns, including where and how they got them. However, just 251 people answered questions about their firearms.

They found 60 percent of respondents said their guns were bought from either a gun store, pawn shop or some other store. Assuming those stores were all federally licensed dealers those purchases were subject to a background check. The remaining 40 percent said their guns came from gun shows, a family member, a friend, through the mail or some other means. Researchers estimated that added up to two million sales and transfers per year that were "off the book."

Create a More Connected Minnesota

MPR News is your trusted resource for the news you need. With your support, MPR News brings accessible, courageous journalism and authentic conversation to everyone - free of paywalls and barriers. Your gift makes a difference.

However, some opponents of stricter gun control laws say this number is inaccurate. John Lott, economist, gun rights supporter and the author of the book "More Guns, Less Crime," wrote in the National Review in January that the research contains bias. He said if the guns inherited from family members and friends were originally bought from licensed dealers then the percentage of gun sales or transfers without a background check fell to around 11.5 percent, not 40 percent.

However, the survey does not specify if the gun owners surveyed were themselves eligible to pass a background check for the firearm they received from a family member. Researchers say they spoke with adults who were fluent in English or Spanish and were non-institutionalized.

Transfers of guns between family members are not unusual. Rep. Michael Paymar, DFL-St. Paul, who authored a bill requiring background checks for nearly all private gun sales or transfers, exempted transactions between relatives.

But a competing House proposal does not include extended background checks. Rep. Debra Hilstrom, a Brooklyn Center Democrat, is expected this week to unveil a bill that focuses more on tougher penalties for those who possess guns illegally. The bill is backed by Minnesota sheriffs.

Universal background checks get wide support in local and nationwide polls, even when among members of the National Rifle Association.

A survey taken by GOP pollster Frank Luntz that found that 74 percent of NRA members supported background checks for all gun sales.

Last month the NRA released results from its own survey which found that 92 percent oppose "a ban on private gun sales."

The Paymar bill does not call for a ban on private sales, but would require private sellers to conduct their transaction through federally licensed dealers, who conduct background checks.