On Air
0:00
0:00
Open In Popup
MPR News

Franken, McFadden complain about big money but still rake it in

Share story

Franken and McFadden
DFL U.S. Senator Al Franken and Republican challenger Mike Mcadden.
MPR News File

When it comes to money in politics, U.S. Sen. Al Franken often complains that there is just too much of it.

  But when Franken called the Supreme Court's Citizens United decision that opened the door for corporations, unions and individuals to spend unlimited amounts on candidates a "disaster" earlier this month, his impassioned Senate floor speech disguised a central fact of his campaign, and that of his Republican opponent, businessman Mike McFadden.

  Both are benefiting from a sophisticated network of donors and committees that have flourished in the wake of the legal decisions Franken and others often criticize.

  The U.S. Senate race between Franken and McFadden is not expected to be the most expensive statewide race in the country but both campaigns are expected to spend millions.

More: Election 2014 | All politics | Policast podcast | Capitol View blog

  So far, Franken has raised $15 million and has spent about $12 million. More than $1.5 million of that has come from joint fundraising committees, which allow candidates and political parties to team-up and split the proceeds from a fundraising event.

  Such funds aren't new, but they have proliferated in recent years. After another Supreme Court decision earlier this year lifted the total amount a single donor can give to candidates, PACs, and other fundraising entities, they've become far more popular, said Larry Noble, general counsel of the Campaign Legal Center, a nonpartisan organization that focuses on campaign finance and elections.

  Following the court's ruling in McCutcheon vs. the Federal Election Commission, donors still are limited in how much they can give a candidate. But joint fundraising committees allow a single donor to cut a much larger check to be divided among candidates, Noble said.

  "They allow wealthy donors to give a lot more money," Noble said. "It makes sense for the candidate to partner with as many different entities as they can."

  When the court announced its decision this spring, Franken said it was a terrible one because it gives "wealthy, well-funded corporate interests undue influence, access, and power."

  "Ordinary people in Minnesota and around the country don't have the luxury of pouring millions into political campaigns," Franken said.

  Nevertheless, Franken and the Minnesota DFL established their joint-fundraising committee earlier this year, which so far has netted Franken's campaign at least $192,000.

  Franken said he's playing by a set of rules that he ultimately disagrees with.

Joint fundraising committees
Each candidate is attached to several joint fundraising committees, which have become more popular recently after the Supreme Court lifted the overall cap on how much one donor can give over the course of an election cycle. Data source: Federal Election Commission.
MPR News Graphic

  "I wish there wasn't a need for progressives to form committees like that," Franken said. "But because of these decisions, they do. We can't unilaterally disarm."

  McFadden, who has so far raised nearly $4.2 million to compete against Franken, is associated with at least three joint-fundraising committees.

  McFadden agrees with Franken that money plays an outsize role in campaigns.

  "I'm right in the middle of the storm," McFadden said. "My observation is that there's way too much money in political campaigns. It's crazy."

  But McFadden also said he'd use caution in limiting spending if it meant violating free speech rights.

  That was the Supreme Court's reasoning when it issued its controversial Citizens United ruling in 2010. At the time, the court said that the government can't regulate corporate free speech. The decision led to the rise of super PACs, which can raise and spend unlimited amounts of money from corporations, unions and individuals to benefit a few candidates, so long as the PAC doesn't coordinate with the candidates' campaigns.

  Franken, who recently co-sponsored a constitutional amendment to overturn Citizens United, has the backing of at least two super PACs this election cycle. And McFadden is benefiting from the backing of five political groups, including super PACs like the Heartland Campaign Fund, which is dedicated entirely to helping him win.

PAC giving
Some of these organizations, including the Alliance for a Better Minnesota Federal PAC and the Heartland Campaign Fund are technically considered super PACs. Data source: Federal Election Commission.
MPR News Graphic

  So far, the Heartland Campaign Fund has spent more than $50,000 on radio ads opposing Franken. It is bankrolled mostly by a single donor: West Coast Venture Capital has given the committee $100,000. The company's owner, California businessman Carl Berg, has given McFadden at least $5,200 according to campaign finance reports.

  The Supreme Court decisions have given wealthy donors maximum flexibility in how they support candidates, Hamline University political science professor David Schultz said.

  "It's really opened up the possibility for individuals and donors to make more contributions, to more entities at a greater amount than they could have done a year ago," he said.

  Take Seth MacFarlane, a top Franken donor and creator of the cartoon sitcom "Family Guy." He has given $5,000 to Franken's 2014 re-election bid. 

Giving
Seth MacFarlane, a top Franken donor and creator of the cartoon sitcom "Family Guy," has given $5,000 to Franken's 2014 re-election bid, plus an additional $35,000 to other political groups. Data source: Federal Election Commission.
MPR News Graphic

  But MacFarlane has also donated $10,000 to the Franken Senate Victory 2014 fund, which is a joint-fundraising committee with the Minnesota DFL party, $5,000 to the WIN Minnesota Federal PAC, which was created to help Franken and U.S. Rep. Rick Nolan of the 8th Congressional District, and $10,000 to the Minnesota DFL.

  Donors, Near and Far

  While both Franken and McFadden rely on wealth donors to support their campaigns, their money also comes from people who give small amounts — so small that their names aren't listed on campaign finance reports.

  More than half of Franken's campaign support comes from small dollar donors, and most of those donations are under $100, according to his campaign.

  But both candidates' fundraising networks extend far beyond Minnesota.

  Of the $4 million large donations McFadden has to detail for the government, nearly $1.5 million have come from people as far away as Alaska.

Source of contributions
Data source: Federal Election Commission. The graphic shows contributions from Jan. 1, 2013 through July 23, 2014 for Sen. Al Franken, and April 1, 2013 through July 23, 2014 for Mike McFadden. Campaigns are not required to itemize contributions from donors who give less than $200 in aggregate.
MPR News Graphic

  Based on the latest data from the Federal Elections Commission, roughly 75 percent of Franken's large dollar donations come from out of state.

  "It suggests both sophistication in terms of knowing how to convince people from elsewhere in the country they ought to give to your race," Schultz said. "But it also suggests the level of importance donors attach to that particular race."

  Despite all the money pouring in, whether the Minnesota Senate race ends up being one of the most contested in the country — and the most expensive — may not be clear until the last weeks of the election, Schultz said.