Near Two Harbors, 34 structures burned and Highway 61 closed; in Crow Wing County, a 1,600-acre fire sparked evacuations

MPR News helps you turn down the noise and build shared understanding. Turn up your support for this public resource and keep trusted journalism accessible to all. 

Turn Up Your Support

By CALVIN WOODWARD and SAM HANANEL, Associated Press


      WASHINGTON (AP) - Labor is roaring again, like in the old days.
But it's a wounded sound now.


      In the bitter aftermath of a showdown with Wisconsin's governor,
and as other states move to weaken public employee bargaining
rights, unions and their allies dare to hope they can turn rage
into revival. 


This could be a make-or-break moment for a movement
that brought the nation the 40-hour week, overtime pay, upward
mobility, a storied century of brawls, progressivism and corruption
- and now a struggle to stay relevant in the modern age.


      Not so many answer to the call anymore when labor demands, as it
did in the bloody strife of Kentucky coal country generations ago,
"Which side are you on?"


      One way or another, the Wisconsin Waterloo and the forces it set
loose will fill a chapter in organized labor's history. The dispute
mobilized masses, attracted public support on the side of workers
and set up a political donnybrook to play out in the months ahead
as labor leaders seek voters' vengeance against the Republicans who
eviscerated union rights.


      But it was, at the core, a defeat for labor in the one place
where it has stayed strong: the public sector.


      Suddenly this redoubt looks like a fat target.


      "I think Republicans smell blood in the water," said Leon
Fink, a labor historian at the University of Illinois at Chicago.
"Politics is a highly organized game of money ball, and this could
set back both the unions and Democratic Party power for years."


      Since the heyday of organized labor's influence in the 1950s,
when union membership reached its peak at about one of every three
workers, unions have fought a losing battle against the steady
erosion of membership and clout.


      Last year union membership fell to 11.9 percent of all workers,
and just 6.9 percent of the private sector. The number of major
strikes in 2009 and 2010 was the lowest on record.


      If you're a labor sympathizer wondering why unions got weak,
pick your poison.


      The decline of unions in the private sector mirrored the push to
globalization, especially the loss of U.S. manufacturing jobs to
other countries and the shift of other factories from the longtime
industrial heartland to states less hospitable to organized labor.


      Companies took an increasingly aggressive stance against union
organizers, emboldened by the Reagan administration's firing of
11,000 striking air traffic controllers in 1981. That act was taken
as a wink to the corporate world that the long-established order
was upended and that business, too, could play rough.


      "Labor now gives off an almost animal sense of weakness,"
Chicago union lawyer Thomas Geoghegan wrote in his Reagan-era ode
to the movement - something of an obituary for it.


      In the mid-1970s, when miners pulled off one of their multiple
massive strikes, they choked coal production, idled steel plants
that were starved of fuel and caused rolling brownouts in New York
City. Americans far removed from strikes sharply felt their
effects.


      In the 1970s, the nation saw an average of 269 major strikes or
lockouts each year. The number has dropped precipitously ever
since, to 17 per year over the past decade. The five in 2009 were
the fewest since the Bureau of Labor Statistics started counting in
1947.


      When industrial unions negotiated higher wages and better
working conditions in more influential times, those advances
rippled through the economy, setting a benchmark for union and
nonunion workplaces. With less than 7 percent of the private sector
unionized now, contracts no longer have the reach to raise all
boats.


      Young workers today float from job to job and often have little
vested interest in long-term improvements in employee satisfaction
at a company. That has made it harder to organize new generations
to replace the loyalists of old.


      Nor are communities as cohesive as they once were.


      When 1,900 miners staged an 11-month strike against Pittston
Coal in 1989-90 to restore health and other benefits for retirees,
widows and disabled miners, their makeshift Camp Solidarity drew
thousands from across southwestern Virginia, West Virginia and
Kentucky as well as from coal towns as far away as Canada. More
than 37,000 participated in wildcat strikes throughout coal country
to support the Pittston miners in a standoff that ranged between
peaceful civil disobedience and ugly confrontation. The United Mine
Workers finally won the day.


      And now? It's questionable how much common cause there will be
between the public servants whose union rights are at risk and the
rest of the population.


      Instead of solidarity, says John Russo, labor studies professor
at Youngstown State University, a "politics of resentment" may be
in play.


      "There's a sense of hopelessness," he says. "Some people feel
like, 'If we're not going to go anywhere, I'm going to make sure
nobody else is going anywhere.'"


      To be sure, unions have made recent strides in pulling in new
members in the service sector and health care industry. Labor
remains a powerful political force. Senate Majority Leader Harry
Reid, D-Nev., owes his narrow re-election victory last year to the
dogged work of union organizers.


      "There is no institution in America on either side of the aisle
that has an infrastructure that gets people to the polls like the
labor movement," said Amy Dean, a former head of the AFL-CIO in
California's Silicon Valley. "Nobody can put people out on the
streets and go door to door like we can."


      Public sector unions have grown in recent decades as labor
leaders found less resistance in state legislatures - the first
being Wisconsin in 1959 - to granting public employees collective
bargaining rights. In 2009, for the first time ever, there were
more union members working for federal, state, local and municipal
governments than in all of the private sector.


      Now that trend is meeting the budget crunch in state after
state, and running into waves of Republicans elected in November.
Conservatives see this as an opportunity to show that public-sector
unions simply spend dues to elect Democratic lawmakers with the
goal of boosting government workers' wages and benefits, even if it
means raising taxes for everyone else to pay for it.


      Beyond Wisconsin, Ohio is moving to restrict the collective
bargaining rights of roughly 350,000 teachers, firefighters, police
officers and other public employees - a wider sweep of the public
sector. 


Efforts to take away union powers continue as well in
Florida, Iowa, Tennessee, Indiana and more states with Republicans
in charge. The Democratic governors of California and New York also
seek concessions from the public- service unions, but without
trying to curb their labor rights.


      Now union leaders and Democrats are pinning their hopes on a
backlash will spread into next year's elections and help fuel
recall efforts to oust GOP lawmakers who backed the anti-union
agenda.


      Unions remain a core of the Democratic Party, a reliable source
of campaign money and boots on the ground during election season.
But without huge membership numbers in the movement, Democrats no
longer jump every time labor calls. 


Democratic President Bill
Clinton's push for the North American Free Trade Agreement, against
union opposition, was one big signal that the alliance was no
longer cast in stone.

      After President Barack Obama was elected with a Democratic
majority in Congress, unions pinned their hopes on passing
legislation that would make it easier to organize workers. The
"card check" bill would have let unions simply have a majority of
workers sign cards to support forming a union instead of voting in
a secret-ballot election. Unions complain that company managers
often intimidate and threaten to fire workers in the run-up to such
elections, causing many workers to vote no.


      But the measure stalled in the Senate as conservative Democrats
declined to support it. Business spent millions lobbying against
card check.


      Indeed, it has been decades since the federal government has
advanced collective bargaining rights to any substantial degree, no
matter which party had power. Labor might be forgiven for asking
Democrats, too, which side they are on.


      Associated Press writer Ann Sanner in Columbus, Ohio,
contributed to this report.

Gallery

Business and Economic News

In the bitter aftermath of a showdown with Wisconsin's governor,
and as other states move to weaken public employee bargaining
rights, unions and their allies dare to hope they can turn rage
into revival.

Labor in full roar again, but it's not the same

Go Deeper.

Like this?

News you can use in your inbox