Until 8 p.m. includes Twin Cities area

MPR News helps you turn down the noise and build shared understanding. Turn up your support for this public resource and keep trusted journalism accessible to all. 

Turn Up Your Support

Go to page ten and figure eight of this 2010 

 by the University of Minnesota's Shengyin Xu, Research Assistant and the Metropolitan Design Center and Ignacio San Martin, Dayton Hudson Chair of Urban Design and Director of the Metropolitan Design Center. The study tries to measure metro Twin Citians' impact on the environment.

I stumbled on this when I went in search of some kind of measure of our collective electricity use here in the Sin Cities with the announcement that a sizable Xcel wind energy project in North Dakota is off.  For the moment.

The assumption by energy analysts is a good share of the juice generated by the wind turbines in the Merricourt Ridge project in south central North Dakota was destined for the "Minnesota market."

At the time Xcel issued a statement that it was pulling out because of the damage the turbines could do to migrating rare birds.

The project is in a major North American migratory bird flyway.  Lots of our winged friends including the endangered whooping crane cruise through that area.

And the worry was the birds would collide with the wind towers.  And die.

The wind energy analysts are, well, a little huffy about that criticism.  They argue we're cooking the planet with all the greenhouse gases created from burning coal in order to make electricity to power our big flat screen TV's, air conditioners and shopping center lights.

The priority, they argue, is slowing climate change by way of switching to non-greenhouse gas producing sources of energy.  Such as wind.

Minnesota News

The Cities Blog

Dan Olson

Author

Take a look at the electricity portion - 28%!

Twin Cities “ecological” foot print is GIGANTIC!

Go Deeper.

Like this?

News you can use in your inbox