Court questions lab test used to convict rapist
Go Deeper.
Create an account or log in to save stories.
Like this?
Thanks for liking this story! We have added it to a list of your favorite stories.
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court has questioned the testimony of a DNA expert that helped convict a man of rape, the latest high court case to focus on the meaning of the constitutional requirement that defendants be able to confront witnesses against them.
The justices on Tuesday considered the convicted rapist's claim that his constitutional rights were violated when the expert testified that the man's DNA matched a sample taken from the victim, even though the expert played no role in the tests that extracted genetic evidence from the victim's sample.
In addition, no one from the company that performed the analysis showed up at the trial to defend it.
The court has previously ruled that defendants have the right to cross-examine the forensic analysts who prepare laboratory reports used at trial.
(Copyright 2011 by The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.)
Turn Up Your Support
MPR News helps you turn down the noise and build shared understanding. Turn up your support for this public resource and keep trusted journalism accessible to all.
