Women hear conflicting advice about the best time to start a family. They're warned against waiting too long for health and fertility reasons, and women who put off starting a family for a career are labeled selfish.
But a recent article in The Atlantic claims that much of the information we use for fertility statistics is outdated and inconclusive:
The widely cited statistic that one in three women ages 35 to 39 will not be pregnant after a year of trying, for instance, is based on an article published in 2004 in the journal Human Reproduction. Rarely mentioned is the source of the data: French birth records from 1670 to 1830. The chance of remaining childless — 30 percent — was also calculated based on historical populations. In other words, millions of women are being told when to get pregnant based on statistics from a time before electricity, antibiotics, or fertility treatment.
Other studies show a more hopeful conclusion for women waiting to conceive:
One study, published in Obstetrics & Gynecology in 2004 and headed by David Dunson (now of Duke University), examined the chances of pregnancy among 770 European women. It found that with sex at least twice a week, 82 percent of 35-to-39-year-old women conceive within a year, compared with 86 percent of 27-to-34-year-olds. (The fertility of women in their late 20s and early 30s was almost identical — news in and of itself.)
Although some say studies have caused unnecessary alarm, the American Society of Reproductive Medicine says a woman's best chance to conceive is in her 20s and particularly declines after age 35: A healthy 30-year-old has a 20 percent change of getting pregnant each month; by age 40, that drops to 5 percent each month.
Your support matters.
You make MPR News possible. Individual donations are behind the clarity in coverage from our reporters across the state, stories that connect us, and conversations that provide perspectives. Help ensure MPR remains a resource that brings Minnesotans together.