Winter storm warnings continue in northern Minnesota 

MPR News helps you turn down the noise and build shared understanding. Turn up your support for this public resource and keep trusted journalism accessible to all. 

Turn Up Your Support

When you flip on a light switch, odds are, you're burning coal. But as the fracking boom continues to unleash huge quantities of natural gas, the nation's electric grid is changing. Power plants are increasingly turning to this low-cost, cleaner-burning fossil fuel.

Bill Pentak stands in the middle of a construction site, looking up at his company's latest project towering overhead — a new natural gas power plant.

"This plant was sited precisely where it is because of its access to the abundant, high-quality natural gas that's found a mile to two miles beneath our feet," he says.

He's referring to the Marcellus Shale underfoot. In recent years, this part of north-central Pennsylvania has become home to one of the most productive gas fields in the world.

Pentak works for Panda Power Funds, a Dallas, Texas-based company that has two more gas plants planned for Pennsylvania.

"What's taking place here is taking place across the United States," Pentak says.

It's a trend Gary Helm is watching. He studies emerging markets for the PJM Interconnection, the regional grid organization for the Mid-Atlantic and Midwest. It's sort of like an air-traffic controller for the power system that helps keep the lights on for 61 million people.

"We see, down the road, definitely a lot of gas coming online," he says.

That's because the rise in fracking freed up a lot more, cheap gas.

Up until the mid-2000s about half the electricity in the U.S. was produced by burning coal, while 20 percent or less came from gas.

Tyler Hodge, an analyst with the Energy Information Administration, says these days, coal has dropped to about 40 percent of the nation's power, and gas now accounts for nearly a third.

"Definitely the Mid-Atlantic and Pennsylvania regions especially are showing some significant shifts towards natural gas," he says.


Coal plants are also retiring as the Obama administration pushes its 

, which would require the country to cut carbon emissions by 30 percent from 2005 levels, by the year 2030.


Back at the construction site, Bill Pentak stands next to the plant's generator and points out that gas has an advantage in all this: As more renewables come online, gas plants can ramp up and down quickly.

So when the sun isn't shining, or the wind isn't blowing, he says gas can fill in the gaps.

"You have to have something that can be quickly dispatched to make up for that lost power, or it threatens the reliability of the grid," he says.

That's not to say using more gas doesn't pose some problems.

Although gas produces about half the carbon emissions that coal does when you burn it, there is still uncertainty within the scientific community about its overall climate impact.

Christina Simeone of the Kleinman Center for Energy Policy at the University of Pennsylvania says drilling and transporting gas leads to the leakage of methane, a potent greenhouse gas.

"When you look at gas production, you look at coal production, you know, these are imperfect resources that do have impacts," she says, "just like all these resources are imperfect and they all have impacts."

The Energy Information Administration is projecting that gas power generation will become increasingly common under the Obama administration's climate plan.

Business and Economic News

Environmental News

Marie Cusick

Author

Driven by new regulations and fracking, more coal power plants are retiring for cheaper, cleaner-burning natural gas. But scientists have yet to work out the fossil fuel's imperfect climate footprint.

How fracking is fueling a power shift from coal to gas

Go Deeper.

Like this?

News you can use in your inbox