Western, central and northern Minnesota under windy, dry weather conditions 

MPR News helps you turn down the noise and build shared understanding. Turn up your support for this public resource and keep trusted journalism accessible to all. 

Turn Up Your Support

In a 5-4 decision, the U.S. Supreme Court said that Texas' legislative and congressional maps are not a racial gerrymander and that all districts are OK, except for one, which it determined is a racial gerrymander — House District 90.

"Except with respect to one Texas House district, we hold that the court below erred in effectively enjoining the use of the districting maps adopted by the Legislature in 2013," conservative Justice Samuel Alito wrote in the majority opinion.

In a one-page concurrence, joined by Neil Gorsuch, Clarence Thomas — one of the most conservative (in philosophy and use of words) justices — reiterated his view that Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act "does not apply to redistricting," per SCOTUSBlog.

Justice Sonia Sotomayor, joined by the court's liberals, wrote a scathing 46-page dissent. (That is five pages longer than the majority opinion.)


"The Court today goes out of its way to permit the State of Texas to use maps that the three-judge District Court unanimously found were adopted for the purpose of preserving the racial discrimination that tainted its previous maps," she wrote.  Copyright 2019 NPR. To see more, visit https://www.npr.org.

Politics and Government News

Social Issues

The court said just one district is unconstitutional -- House District 90. Justice Sonia Sotomayor issued a scathing dissent that was five pages longer than the majority opinion.

Supreme Court says Texas political map is largely not a racial gerrymander

Go Deeper.

Like this?

News you can use in your inbox