Wintry mix spreads across Minnesota

MPR News helps you turn down the noise and build shared understanding. Turn up your support for this public resource and keep trusted journalism accessible to all. 

Turn Up Your Support


Environmental activists are using a new strategy to block construction of oil and gas pipelines. It already has worked in New York where construction on the 

 has stalled. Now activists are trying the strategy in Oregon.
The proposed 

 project includes a pipeline that would transport natural gas across the Cascades mountain range to the Oregon coast. There it would be turned into liquefied natural gas (LNG) for export.
At a recent protest rally supporters of the 

 campaign submitted more than 25,000 comments to encourage Gov. Kate Brown and her 

"The state of Oregon has the ability to deny the Clean Water Act permit and stop this project once and for all if this project would have negative impacts on Oregon's water ways, which we know it will," says Hannah Sohl, director of the group Rogue Climate.

 where they won't contribute to climate change. Blocking construction of infrastructure, such as pipelines, is one way of doing that. If gas can't get to market no one will drill for it.

The 

 is the primary agency responsible for approving interstate gas pipelines.
"You can count on, I think, two fingers the number of gas pipeline projects that FERC has ultimately rejected," says Daniel Estrin, general counsel and advocacy director for the 

.
Activists' frustration with the FERC has increased under the fossil fuel friendly Trump administration. That's why Estrin looked for a new way to stop a pipeline in New York, and he found it in 

. It gives states the right to review new projects to make sure they don't harm local water.


"So it essentially gives states veto power over federal decisions," says Estrin.

But the gas industry argues that's not how the law is supposed to work.

"For years the certifications were approved — often conditioned in ways that would ensure states could protect their water quality," says Don Santa, president and CEO of Interstate Natural Gas Association of America.

This new legal strategy activists are using changed that.

"So it's very different now that it's being used as a sword rather than a shield," says Santa, who argues this pipeline-killing "sword" harms consumers and interrupts interstate commerce.

 when LNG from Russia was delivered to Boston to satisfy customer needs during a cold snap. "When only a few hundred miles away you had the most prolific and most affordable natural gas in the world in the Marcellus Shale — all because you couldn't build the pipe to connect that supply to consumers," says Santa.


The industry's effort to stop this new legal strategy in court have failed so far. Now the gas pipeline industry is supporting legislation in Congress.


Republican Sen. John Barrasso of Wyoming 

 at the end of July that would limit a state's power in this process, which is ironic given that Republicans generally embrace state's rights.


Daniel Estrin of the Waterkeeper Alliance says the legislation is an overreaction.

"People are running around with their hair on fire because one pipeline project got rejected because the state determined that it would have too great an impact on water quality," says Estrin.


Few people think this legislation has a chance of becoming law because of the states' rights issue. So activists continue to encourage states — usually only those with Democratic governors — to exercise their veto power and stop new pipeline projects.  Copyright 2019 NPR. To see more, visit https://www.npr.org.

Environmental News

Water

Climate

Jeff Brady

Author

Oil and gas pipeline opponents have a new legal strategy. They're encouraging states to exercise rights granted in the Clean Water Act to stop new pipeline construction.

Activists have a new strategy to block gas pipelines: state's rights

Go Deeper.

Like this?

News you can use in your inbox