MPR News Chief Meteorologist Paul Huttner signs off

MPR News helps you turn down the noise and build shared understanding. Turn up your support for this public resource and keep trusted journalism accessible to all. 

Turn Up Your Support

The next great insect repellent might come from a strain of bacteria that lives inside a common parasitic worm.

 has found that a compound derived from these bacteria is three times more potent than DEET in repelling mosquitoes. More research must be done to demonstrate its safety, but this bacterial chemical could play an important role in the fight against mosquito-borne illness.



, a professor of entomology at the University of Wisconsin-Madison who oversaw the study, explains that the project started in the lab of her late colleague, 

. She and her student Il-Hwan Kim were studying bacteria called 

, which lives inside the tiny roundworms called nematodes. These nematodes parasitize insects in the soil, sneaking into their bodies and releasing hordes of 

, which soon kill the insect. Then, without the insect's immune system to contend with, the nematodes devour the carcass and multiply.
According to Paskewitz, Lan wanted to crack 

 insecticidal code in hopes that it might lead to a novel mosquito killer. She put the bacteria into the artificial blood supply she feeds to her mosquito colonies, hoping they would ingest the bacteria and she could track whether the mosquitoes were harmed. But her mosquitoes wouldn't go anywhere near the treated blood, much less ingest it. "The mosquitoes would die from drying out rather than touch the thing," says Paskewitz. That observation stuck in Paskewitz's mind, suggesting that something produced by these bacteria make might be useful as an insect repellent.


Since the 1940s, the chemical DEET has been our first line of defense against mosquitoes. It's still the most effective repellent we have.


But DEET has its problems. One is stigma. "As a public health entomologist, I believe that DEET is an effective and safe product to use [

], but I do know that some consumers are concerned about synthetic chemicals," says Paskewitz. "Whether those concerns are founded in evidence may be beside the point. What matters from my perspective is that people don't have a barrier to using repellents, so that in the event of the next Zika or West Nile virus outbreak, we're prepared."


DEET also needs to be reapplied often, which can leave people exposed if they forget. And at high concentrations, DEET can melt plastic, making it difficult to imbue DEET into clothing that could be worn for longer-lasting protection.


What's more, DEET's effectiveness may not be permanent, according to 

, an evolutionary biologist and disease ecologist at Arizona State University. "There is some evidence that resistance to DEET can evolve in mosquito populations, and mosquitoes can also learn to overcome their aversion to DEET," she says. Because living populations can evolve in response to single interventions, it's best tackle the problem from many angles. "In that sense, there is a void to be filled," Huijben says.
To see if 

could fill that void, Paskewitz and her collaborator Mayur Kajla first had to isolate the potential repellent from everything else the bacteria produces. To home in on the active compound, Kajla isolated smaller and smaller components of a sort of bacterial soup and tested whether each mixture repelled mosquitoes.
Kajla explains that since we don't yet know whether this substance is toxic, scientists can't just slather a subject's arm in 

, stick it into a swarm of mosquitoes and see if they bite. So instead, he put a mixture of mosquito food – basically, fake blood dyed red — inside a skin-like sausage casing membrane. He soaked cheesecloth in the bacterial soup and layered it over this casing. Then, mosquitoes had 30 minutes to feed, after which the researchers counted how many mosquitoes were engorged with red bellies. The better the repellent, the fewer red bellies.
Eventually Kajla identified the repellent compound that the bacteria secreted. Chemical analysis revealed it to be part of a class of chemicals known as 

. With the repellent identified, Kajla then used the same setup to see how it fared against existing repellents.
"We were surprised at how well the bacterial repellent worked," says Kajla. You'd need three times as much DEET and eight times as much 

, another effective repellent, to repel the same percentage of insects.


The researchers varied the concentration of the fabclavine mixture and observed that at lower concentrations, most mosquitoes landed on the feeding apparatus, but only about half fed. This suggests that, at low concentrations of the mixture, mosquitoes are repelled by the taste, but not the smell. By contrast, almost no mosquitoes landed and none fed when there were higher concentrations of the chemical, suggesting the mosquitoes were repelled by the smell alone. Kajla says, "at this point we don't know how the deterrent is affecting mosquitoes, but it could be both taste and smell."


"This is a really exciting result," says 

, a neurogeneticist at Florida International University who studies mosquito genetics and was not involved in the study. "DEET is almost like magic, and we don't find things that work as well as it does everyday." DeGennaro also raised the possibility that the mosquitoes' repulsion might be an innate, adaptive strategy to avoid getting anywhere near the deadly 

that harbor the compound.
More work needs to be done before you can douse yourself in this bacterial concoction and head into the woods with abandon. According to Paskewitz, fabclavines may be difficult to chemically synthesize at scale. But "bacterial fermentation, which is used to produce the widely used insecticide

 could work for fabclavines," Paskewitz says.


According to Huijben, the broader fight against mosquito-borne disease is changing, and repellents may play an increasingly important role. In the case of malaria, which she studies, mosquito populations are adapting around once effective measures. Bed nets proved effective in preventing the transmission of malaria via mosquitoes, which historically happened during evening hours when mosquitoes fed. But Huijben says mosquitoes are evolving to feed outside during the daytime, when their food source isn't safely snoozing under a net.

If fabclavine proves safe, effective and practical for human use, the ancient methods of the roundworm and its bacterial partners in crime could prove to be the latest weapon in the race to ward off mosquitoes.

Jonathan Lambert is an intern on NPR's Science Desk. You can follow him on Twitter: @evolambert

Health

Jonathan Lambert

Author

An insect-killing bacteria that lives inside a parasitic worm might hold the key to developing a powerful new repellent.

Bacteria in worms make a mosquito repellent that might beat DEET

Go Deeper.

Like this?

News you can use in your inbox