School, college and other closings for Monday

MPR News helps you turn down the noise and build shared understanding. Turn up your support for this public resource and keep trusted journalism accessible to all. 

Turn Up Your Support

The Supreme Court has accepted three cases that ask whether federal anti-discrimination laws should apply to sexual orientation and gender identity in the workplace, putting the court on track to consider high-profile LGBTQ issues after its next term begins this fall.

 were consolidated because both include claims that employers discriminated on the basis of sexual orientation. A third — 

 — involves the question of whether existing discrimination laws apply to transgender workers.


The Supreme Court granted petitions for writs of certiorari for the three cases Monday morning, adding them to their workload for the term that will start in October — meaning any decisions and opinions will emerge in the runup to the national election in 2020.


But the court also set limits as it accepted the cases. As 

 states, the scope of the court's review of the 

 case is limited to only question "whether Title VII prohibits discrimination against transgender people based on (1) their status as transgender or (2) sex stereotyping" under the 1989 decision in the 

 case.
The Supreme Court's order refers to 

, the part of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 that prohibits employers from discriminating on the basis of race, color, religion, sex and national origin. In recent years, lower federal courts have disagreed on whether the same protections should apply to people based on their sexual orientation and gender identity. That divide can be seen in the trio of cases now up for review.


"In two of the cases, lower courts sided with the plaintiffs," NPR's Leila Fadel reports for our Newscast unit, "one in Michigan where a transgender woman was fired from her job at a funeral home based on her gender identity; another, out of New York where a skydiving instructor was allegedly fired because he's gay. But in a third case in Georgia, a gay man who was fired from his job as a child welfare services coordinator lost."

In that third case, the Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit turned away an appeal from Gerald Lynn Bostock last summer. Even before Bostock's appeal request was declined by the full panel, his attorneys already had asked the Supreme Court to weigh in.

, 11th Circuit judges voted 9-2 to decline Bostock's case — triggering a dissent from Judge Robin Rosenbaum, who wrote, "I continue to firmly believe that Title VII prohibits discrimination against gay and lesbian individuals because they fail to conform to their employers' views when it comes to whom they should love."
A similar rationale was put forth by the 2nd Circuit in the 

American Bar Association said last spring

, "Indeed, the court found that sexual orientation is doubly delineated by sex because it is a function of both a person's sex and the sex of those to whom he or she is attracted."
Describing the background of the 

Depending on how they are decided, the cases could be seen as either continuing a move toward greater rights and protections for LGBTQ people in the U.S. or representing a shift in momentum, four years after the Supreme Court issued its landmark decision that legalized same-sex marriage.


In response to the news that the cases are heading to the newly conservative-leaning Supreme Court, the 

 called on Congress to explicitly add protections based on sexual orientation and gender identity by approving 

Crime, Law and Justice

Social Issues

Bill Chappell

Author

The court is poised to decide whether Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 applies to sexual orientation and gender identity, along with factors such as race, religion, sex and national origin.

Supreme Court will hear cases on LGBTQ discrimination protections for employees

Go Deeper.

Like this?

News you can use in your inbox