Winter storm warnings continue in northern Minnesota 

MPR News helps you turn down the noise and build shared understanding. Turn up your support for this public resource and keep trusted journalism accessible to all. 

Turn Up Your Support


Nuclear power plants are so big, complicated and expensive to build that more are shutting 

, wants to change that trend by building nuclear plants that are the opposite of existing ones: smaller, simpler and cheaper.
The company says its plant design using 

 also could work well with renewable energy, such as wind and solar, by providing backup

electricity when the wind isn't blowing and the sun isn't shining.
The 

 in the country now are large because they were designed to take advantage of economies of scale. Many are at 

 in the next decade, largely because they can't compete with less expensive natural gas and renewable energy.


To respond to this dilemma, "we've developed economies of small," says Jose Reyes, chief technology officer and co-founder of NuScale.

Instead of one big nuclear reactor, Reyes says his company will string together a series of up to 12 much smaller reactors. They would be built in a factory and transported by truck to a site that would be prepared at the same time.

"You're making your [reactor] pool and all that stuff on-site," says Reyes. "In parallel, you're manufacturing the modules, and then that cuts the construction schedule to about half."

NuScale says it also has simplified how the plants are operated in ways that make them safer.

 happened when a tsunami knocked offline the emergency generators that cooled the reactors and spent fuel, leading to reactor meltdowns.


"We've looked at ways the systems have failed in the past and tried to remove those kind of failure modes from our design," says Karin Feldman, vice president for the company's Program Management Office.

NuScale's design doesn't depend on pumps or generators that could fail in an emergency because it uses passive cooling. The reactors would be in a containment vessel, underground and in a huge pool of water that can absorb heat.


That means that even a reactor that fails would still be safe.

"It doesn't require any additional water," says Feldman. "It doesn't require AC or DC power. It doesn't require any operator action. And it can stay in that safe configuration for as long as is needed."





NuScale plans to build its first nuclear power plant at the 

. The electricity will power the lab and go to 

, or UAMPS, which serves 46 member utilities in six Western states.
The organization was looking for a carbon-free source of electricity to generate power when intermittent sources, such as solar panels and wind turbines are offline.

And it turns out NuScale's modular design is good for that.


Big nuclear reactors run all the time, but NuScale's collection of smaller reactors can be ramped up and down relatively quickly. Batteries can back up intermittent sources of renewable energy, too, but UAMPS CEO Doug Hunter says NuScale's reactors are cheaper.

"Each module would have enough fuel in it for up to two years of operations, so it's like we're a battery that has a two-year charge to it," says Hunter.

 that its plant design is safe. The company 

challenging. It's so different from existing plants that regulations must be changed to accommodate it. That worries some watchdogs and critics.
"My concern about NuScale is that they believe so deeply that their reactor is safe and doesn't need to meet the same criteria as the larger reactors, that it's pushing for lots of exemptions and exceptions," says Edwin Lyman, acting director of the 

 at the Union of Concerned Scientists.
Lyman argues that even with NuScale's passive safety design, things could go wrong. He'll be among those watching regulators closely as NuScale pushes to have its first power plant built and operating in 2026.  Copyright 2019 NPR. To see more, visit https://www.npr.org.

Jeff Brady

Author

An Oregon company plans a new kind of nuclear power plant that many consider the future of the industry. It's smaller and cheaper and could work well with renewable energy.

This company says the future of nuclear energy is smaller, cheaper, and safer

Go Deeper.

Like this?

News you can use in your inbox