Another wintry storm Friday

MPR News helps you turn down the noise and build shared understanding. Turn up your support for this public resource and keep trusted journalism accessible to all. 

Turn Up Your Support

Many business interests are cheering President Trump's recent rollback of water regulations put in place by the Obama administration. But companies that make money protecting clean water could take a big hit.  

The Trump administration is stripping protections for streams that only run after rain, and for wetlands that don't have a connection to bigger waterways above-ground. Announcing the rule last week at the International Builders' Show in Las Vegas, EPA Administrator Andrew Wheeler said it will "save Americans time and money while accelerating infrastructure projects and economic development."

Trump administration is rolling back Obama-era protections for smaller waterways

The EPA says there's no data on exactly how many waterways would be affected, but 

a leaked presentation by government scientists

 says more than half of wetlands across the country and 18 percent of streams would not have federal protection.

Those rollbacks could mean less work for folks like Adam Davis, the managing partner at Ecosystem Investment Partners.

"One of the most gratifying things about the job is seeing nature come back to life," Davis says. 

The country's lost more than half of its wetlands. The Clean Water Act says that when developers fill in protected wetlands, they have to offset that damage by creating more or restoring them somewhere else. Davis' company operates "mitigation banks" to help them do that. EIP funds wetland restoration through private investment, and then sells credits to developers who impact other, protected waterways.

Mitigation banks sold about $4.8 billion in credits in 2018, and the industry directly employs more people than coal, steel or logging. Those workers include "everything from heavy equipment operators to landscape planners and architects," Davis says.

Before mitigation banks took off, developers often restored their own fragments of wetlands near their sites. But Davis says by pooling investor money, mitigation banks can take on projects that are huge in scale and geared towards improving entire ecosystems. Plus, he says, they do it faster and cheaper than ever before. About 1,600 mitigation banks across the country have restored more than a million acres of wetlands.

"The most exciting thing about this industry is that it fundamentally aligns economics and ecology," Davis says.

But some in the industry worry that the regulatory rollbacks threaten their business. Wendy Weaver, with Montana Aquatic Resources Services — a nonprofit that does wetland mitigation under the Clean Water Act — says the new rule could have huge impacts on her program.

"That might mean we're still around and it might mean we're not," Weaver says.

Weaver says it makes her "sick to her stomach" to think that wetlands protection organizations could have a lot less work.

In Northwest Montana, retired guides and conservationists Paul Roos and John Kowalski posthole through shin-deep snow to get to the headwaters of Nevada Spring Creek, wetlands that have been resurrected through Ecosystem Investment Partners.

"It's sorta sexy over there," Roos says of the waterway he's trekking towards.

Before this property was restored, it was a cattle ranch. The stream had been diverted for irrigation, and destroyed by overgrazing. 

"It was pretty much ecologically dead," he says.

The project took years and millions of dollars of private money to complete. But as he approaches the snaking creek and wetlands, it's clear the ecosystem has come alive. 

Amid a landscape of wintery, white snow, there's bright, verdant green, and the loamy smell of growth and decay. The spring-fed water here stays in the mid-40s year-round, and it's key to the health of the nearby Blackfoot River, a world-famous trout fishery. 

"One of the things that is so remarkable about wetlands is they are disproportionately important across big regional scales," says Richard Hauer, professor emeritus of biology at the University of Montana. 

Hauer says rolling back protections ignores basic science about how water connects underground. He says wetlands filter water, regulate temperature and control flooding. They also provide crucial habitat for wildlife — nearly half of endangered and threatened species depend on wetlands. 

"It literally is from microbes all the way to grizzly bears, it's everything in between," he says.

Adam Davis of Ecosystem Investment Partners says the Nevada Spring Creek project was a laboratory that allowed his company to figure out its business model. They've grown from managing about $200 million five years ago, to a billion dollars today.

Davis is also on the board of the wetland mitigation industry's trade group. He agrees that fewer wetlands will be protected after the regulatory change. But he doesn't think businesses like his are going away. 

"I don't take these things lightly, but there are real drivers beneath the back-and-forth of daily politics that are more fundamental and are just not going anywhere," he says.

Davis says there's likely a lengthy court battle ahead, and states could pass their own regulations to fill federal gaps. 

Business and Economic News

Environmental News

Water

Politics and Government News

Nick Mott

Author

The Trump administration is stripping clean water protections put in place by President Obama, and some in the industry worry that the regulatory changes will threaten their business.

As regulations roll back, could clean water protection business dry up?

Go Deeper.

Like this?

News you can use in your inbox