Winter storm warnings continue in northern Minnesota 

MPR News helps you turn down the noise and build shared understanding. Turn up your support for this public resource and keep trusted journalism accessible to all. 

Turn Up Your Support

 are among the latest countries preparing to formally recognize a state of Palestine — a move by two permanent members of the U.N. Security Council that would deepen their split with Israel and the United States over the 22-month war in Gaza. Canada this week also joined the 

 openness to recognizing Palestinian statehood.

The planned recognition, expected as early as September, could mark a turning point. While France appears ready to move unconditionally, Britain and Canada have tied their decision to actions by Israel or the Palestinian Authority, which governs parts of the Israeli-occupied West Bank. The shift reflects mounting global outrage over the humanitarian toll in Gaza, including 

Mouin Rabbani, a nonresident senior fellow with the Middle East Council on Global Affairs research group, says the move — though largely symbolic — carries diplomatic weight. "When you have states with the significance and importance of France and Britain taking this measure, it does leave the sense of a dam breaking," Rabbani says. "One can expect others to follow."

The move also serves to "put a shot across the bow of Israel," says Michael Lynk, a former U.N. independent expert on human rights in the Palestinian territories. For the nations choosing to recognize a state of Palestine, it signals to the world that they are "annoyed, upset [and] distressed by Israel's conduct of the war in Gaza."

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu 

 in a statement that recognizing a Palestinian state "rewards Hamas's monstrous terrorism & punishes its victims." U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio shared that sentiment in a 

 last week that called it a "reckless decision" that "only serves Hamas propaganda." Palestinian Authority officials welcomed the announcements by France and the U.K., while the 

 that Hamas called France's action a "positive step."

What exactly have France, the U.K. and Canada said?

Paris, London and Ottawa have long supported a two-state solution to resolve the long-running Israeli-Palestinian conflict by establishing a Palestinian state, something that Palestinians say should include the West Bank, Gaza and East Jerusalem. The leaders of the three countries have said they intend to make an announcement at September's U.N. General Assembly in New York. But they are taking slightly different approaches.

Last week, French President Emmanuel Macron, in a 

, assured Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas that France plans to recognize a Palestinian state. Macron called for an immediate ceasefire, the release of all hostages, "massive humanitarian aid to the people of Gaza," ensuring "the demilitarization of Hamas" and rebuilding a Palestinian state that fully recognizes Israel.

U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer has outlined a September timeline for Britain's recognition of a Palestinian state unless Israel agrees to a ceasefire, halts the expansion of Israeli settlements in the West Bank and commits to a two-state solution. His 

 also calls for "the withdrawal of Israeli forces and the removal of Hamas leadership from Gaza as key steps towards a negotiated two-state solution."

Canada has some of the same conditions. In a 

 on Wednesday, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney said his government's move was aimed at preserving a two-state solution "as the only road map for a secure and prosperous future." Carney also said that the Palestinian Authority, which has not held elections since 2006, must hold a vote in 2026 that excludes Hamas.

More than 60,000 Palestinians have been killed by Israeli forces over the course of the war in Gaza, the Gaza Health Ministry says. The war began with a Hamas-led attack in October 2023 that killed about 1,200 people in Israel, according to Israel.

What are the practical and diplomatic implications?

If the U.K. and France recognize a Palestinian state, 4 out of the 5 permanent members of the U.N. Security Council — France, the U.K., Russia and China — will speak with a single voice on the issue. "That means the United States is the only country ... that refuses to budge from its kind of unconditional support for everything that Israel does," according to Khaled Elgindy, a visiting scholar at Georgetown University's Center for Contemporary Arab Studies.

Diplomatically, it means that the recognizing countries could exchange full ambassadors with the Palestinian Authority, says Lynk, who is currently an associate professor at Western University's Faculty of Law, in London, Ontario. 

It would be raising the status of [Canada's] representative office in Ramallah [in the West Bank] to a full embassy with an ambassador instead of a representative,

and Palestine would have an ambassador and a full embassy in Ottawa."

Most countries that don't currently have formal relations with the Palestinian Authority nonetheless have maintained informal ties through various diplomatic, political and humanitarian channels.

"States that recognize Palestine ... would have obligations ... to take steps to protest and take action — actual sanctions if need be — against any state that's interfering with Palestinian sovereignty," Lynk says.

With France and Britain, it could mean two additional votes against Israel at the U.N. Security Council, but as Rabbani notes, "France and Britain have for decades not deployed their veto in defense of Israel." Instead, they've allowed the United States to exercise its veto, he says. "So I don't think anything is going to change in the Security Council."

Lastly, there could be implications for the International Criminal Court (ICC), which 

 for the arrest of Netanyahu and former Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant in November for "crimes against humanity and war crimes" committed since the start of the Gaza conflict. Netanyahu has 

 and the international court an "enemy of humanity."

Yaël Ronen, a senior research fellow at the Minerva Center for Human Rights at Hebrew University, says the recognition "could have legal consequences … in the context of the ICC jurisdiction."

 it would not arrest Netanyahu and Gallant because it would be "incompatible with its obligations in terms of international law with regards to immunities granted to states which are not party to the ICC" — in this case Israel.

So, recognition of a Palestinian state "doesn't mean that those states would necessarily arrest these politicians if they arrive on French or British soil," Ronen says. 

Rabbani adds: "We've seen this year that France has on multiple occasions permitted indicted war criminals, Israeli war criminals who are fugitives from international justice because they're wanted by the ICC, to use French airspace on their way to the United States."

France, Britain and Canada have all said Hamas must be sidelined from a future Palestinian state, but it's not clear whether that is possible.

Hamas, which controls Gaza and is separate from the Palestinian Authority, has relations with some Middle East countries and enjoys limited ties with Russia and China. But the European Union and most Western nations, including the United States, Canada and Australia, have declared the Islamist organization a terrorist group.

"There's a crisis. There's a sense that something needs to be done to stop this. So you do whatever is possible. And if there's nothing else, this is what you do," Ronen says.

Public opinion also plays a role. In the U.K., for example, 45% of Britons now say that their government should recognize a Palestinian state, while only 14% disagree, according to a 

For the countries moving toward recognizing a state of Palestine, Israel's actions have forced their hand, says Rabbani. Former French Foreign Minister Hubert Védrine, speaking to 

, said Macron's government had a duty to do something. "Given the appalling situation in Gaza and the lack of prospects, it was becoming dishonorable to do nothing," Védrine said.

Rabbani also suspects that the countries in question are hoping to revive the possibility of a two-state solution, which he describes as "a framework that is increasingly becoming an illusion."

"They've been placed in an impossible situation by the Israeli government," amid growing domestic political pressure, he says.

In the end, simply recognizing Palestinian statehood is a low-cost option. It may placate a domestic audience demanding action, while doing very little to actually change the situation on the ground, Rabbani says. And it's easier than imposing real sanctions on Israel, which the U.K., France and Canada have not proposed.

"In that sense, there's a very large contradiction between words and action," he says.

Homepage

International

Scott Neuman

Author

The recent push by several countries to recognize a state of Palestine is largely symbolic, but it carries diplomatic and potentially legal weight.

France, U.K., others plan to recognize a Palestinian state. What does that change?

Go Deeper.

Like this?

News you can use in your inbox