Immigration

Former judges defend Minnesota judges who spoke to press about ICE surge

Justice of Department logo
The logo for the Justice Department is seen before a news conference at the Department of Justice on Aug. 23, 2024, in Washington.
Mark Schiefelbein | AP file

Quick Read

A bipartisan group of former judges are defending the Minnesota judges who spoke to the New York Times about ICE defying court orders.

A group of 174 bipartisan former judges has signed a letter defending seven Minnesota District judges who are the subject of a judicial misconduct complaint filed by the Department of Justice.

The Minnesota judges gave interviews to the New York Times published in September about ICE defying court orders.

The complaint alleges the judges' statements were unethical and partisan. U.S. Attorney General Todd Blanche also called on the judges to recuse themselves ​from any case ​involving ⁠the Department of Homeland Security, alleging they had bias against the ​administration.

The letter, co-signed by several retired Minnesota judges including former Minnesota Supreme Court Chief Justice Eric Magnuson, said the complaint is baseless and that the judges' statements were already made public in court documents.

“Instead of dealing with the government’s defiance of judicial orders, the government filed disciplinary charges against the Minnesota judges who lawfully called out their misconduct,” said Nancy Gertner, former United States district judge for the District of Massachusetts, in a statement released Tuesday by a nonpartisan group called Democracy Defenders Fund. “174 retired judges have signed this letter making it clear that there is no basis for those charges.”

In a statement to MPR News in September, Judge Patrick Schiltz said he was acting “well within the ethical rules that apply to federal judges in speaking to the New York Times."