School, college and other closings for Monday

MPR News helps you turn down the noise and build shared understanding. Turn up your support for this public resource and keep trusted journalism accessible to all. 

Turn Up Your Support

The future of reproductive rights for a wide swath of the Mountain West may be decided next week, as three state Supreme Courts hear arguments in cases that will determine abortion access in the region. Here's what to know. 

returned abortion regulating power to states

, Arizona had two seemingly conflicting abortion laws on the books. One, passed just a few months before Roe v. Wade was overturned in 2022, outlaws abortion after 15 weeks. The other, which dates back to 1864, is a near-total ban. 

Arizona abortion providers didn't know which law to follow, until the Arizona Court of Appeals decided to "harmonize" the state's conflicting abortion laws last December. 

 the 1864 near-total ban should continue to apply, but only for non-physicians. Doctors could follow the newer law and provide abortions up to 15 weeks. 

This week, the state Supreme Court will reconsider that ruling to decide which law, or combination of laws, will be enforced.

The justices – all appointed by Republican governors – are known to be conservative. Justice Bill Montgomery, who has made public statements 

," recused himself from the case. But even if the six remaining justices were to decide abortions are illegal in the state except in life-saving circumstances, there is still a question of enforcement. 

Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes said she will not prosecute doctors for performing abortions. And Democratic Gov. Katie Hobbs issued an executive order to give Mayes – not county attorneys – the final say when it comes to abortion. 

Whatever the court decides, abortion advocates are already pursuing a 2024 ballot measure that would  enshrine the right to abortion in the Arizona Constitution.

New Mexico allows abortion – can local governments ban it?

Abortion is legal in New Mexico, where the 

 a 1969 ban on the procedure in 2021. Post-

 as surrounding states have banned or restricted the procedure. Clinics forced to close in nearby 

But some conservative areas of New Mexico responded by passing their own local ordinances restricting abortion providers. This week, the state Supreme Court will hear arguments about whether these de facto local bans are lawful. 

In January this year, Democratic Attorney General Raúl Torrez

 to nullify those ordinances in Roosevelt and Lea Counties and the cities of Clovis and Hobbs. Torrez argues they violate the New Mexico Constitution's equal protection clause and exceed local governments' authority to regulate health care.

Since then, two more localities passed local abortion restrictions and the state Legislature enacted a new law prohibiting local governments from restricting access to reproductive health care.

The stakes could be higher than just access to reproductive health care in New Mexico. All the local ordinances cite a 150-year-old federal law known as the

, which prohibits the mailing of anything that could be used to induce abortion.

The law has been largely dormant for decades, but anti-abortion activists say that by citing the federal law in local ordinances, they hope to escalate the matter to the Supreme Court of the United States.

Who gets a say in Wyoming's lawsuit about abortion access?

Under the Wyoming Constitution, people have the right to make their own health care decisions. But does abortion qualify as health care in the state?

That is the question before a judge in Teton County, Wyoming this week, who could issue a ruling or decide to send the case to trial next spring.

The state Supreme Court is hearing arguments over whether to allow two Republican state lawmakers and anti-abortion group Right to Life Wyoming to intervene in the case.

If that happens, the case may have to start all over again, to include arguments from the added parties.

Wyoming's near-total bans on abortion and abortion medication were

 Teton County Judge Melissa Owens combined separate challenges to the laws into one case.

One of the plaintiffs, Dr. Giovannina Anthony, said she and other abortion access advocates plan to continue suing the state no matter what happens.

"That appears, at this point, to be the means at which we keep abortion legal," Anthony said. 

Even if abortion does remain legal in Wyoming, access is still limited– there are only two clinics in the state that provide abortions, and one of them is set to 

 due to the high cost of rent, labor and supplies. That will leave only one in-person provider this winter in Casper, a city in central-Eastern Wyoming.

In neighboring Idaho, a lower court will hear arguments Thursday to determine whether four women who were denied abortions despite the risk to their health can continue their 

 in cases of rape, incest and medical emergencies.

If abortion is outlawed in Wyoming, people will need to travel hundreds of miles to Colorado or Montana for access to care.  

Health

Politics and Government News

Homepage

Katherine Davis-Young (KJZZ)

Author

Alice Fordham (KUNM)

Hanna Merzbach (Wyoming Public Media)

Supreme court justices in Arizona, New Mexico, and Wyoming will hear arguments in cases that will impact abortion access across the Mountain West. Here's what to know.

Supreme Courts in 3 states will hear cases about abortion access this week

Go Deeper.

Like this?

News you can use in your inbox