The Bachmen vs. Lizard People
Go Deeper.
Create an account or log in to save stories.
Like this?
Thanks for liking this story! We have added it to a list of your favorite stories.
Take a moment and look at these two ballots.
Let's compare. Does everyone have their copy of 204C.22 ready?
Turn Up Your Support
MPR News helps you turn down the noise and build shared understanding. Turn up your support for this public resource and keep trusted journalism accessible to all.
Our first stop will be
Subdivision 1
: Ballot valid if intent determinable.
In both cases, the only marks in the ovals are next to a bona fide candidate. I will vouch for the voter's intent with the "X" mark, he/she used it consistently across the full ballot (see Subdivision 10, Different marks).
(We're going to operate under the assumption that it doesn't matter what was in the write-in field, despite what David Icke might say.)
The problem facing the state's Canvassing Board might be reconciling
Subdivision 4
:
Name written in proper place.
If a voter has written the name of an individual in the proper place on a general or special election ballot a vote shall be counted for that individual whether or not the voter makes a mark (X) in the square opposite the blank.
I've polled a few people around the office and consensus seems to be that this is an overvote, meaning the ballot should be discarded.
Aside: I suppose the Franken camp could mount a challenge by saying that "Lizard People" is not the name of an
individual
, though I doubt "voter intends to be funny" is one of the criteria the Canvassing Board will assess. Comedy Central's Indecision 2008 crew, by the way, wonders alike.
Several questions arise: Should the county have accepted the Franken vote? Does the voter consider Al Franken equivalent to the Lizard People? Is Lizard People a collective, or just one person like Cat Power? (Hat tip to the Minnesota Independent, which points out who put Lizard People on the map.)
What this also means — assuming the above holds true &mdash is that a lot of the people who played election judge have an unfounded preference for the Franken ballot, legally speaking.
So, there you have it. A pretty straightforward look at some challenged ballots through the prism of the law. Not so hard, was it?
D'oh!
