Ag dean: I'm sensitive about ag getting all the blame

Here are some notes on U of M College of Food, Agricultural and Natural Resource Sciences Dean Al Levine's remarks to the Legislative-Citizen Commission on Minnesota Resources. They are not a verbatim account:

I'm very sorry about the way it all played out. I have never experienced any censorship. We always defend the faculty first and foremost.  Communication has been unclear, and I apologise for that.

Levine said he wanted to clarify or explain a previous statement to Minnesota Public Radio, in which he said the film "vilified agriculture."

MPR News is Member Supported

What does that mean? The news, analysis and community conversation found here is funded by donations from individuals. Make a gift of any amount today to support this resource for everyone.

Agriculture and farmers have been blamed for society's problems over and over. I'm very sensitive to this. I've met a lot of farmers, and they're very good people, and they're not trying to destroy the earth. The opening of the film seems to blame agriculture for all the issues. But society is involved as well. There are other contributors -- such as lawn chemicals and point-source pollution -- and these all need to be discussed. It's a whole societal issue.

On organic farming, which is featured in the film as a partial solution:

We need more research on organic farming and other methods to make sure they have the ability to help us feed all the people we need to.

Levine was pressed by a couple of commission members to say what the University will do specifically to make sure that such a fiasco doesn't happen again. State Rep. Lyndon Carlson (DFL) described past efforts to beat back proposals to change the U's constitutional autonomy, because legislators wanted it to be free of academic intrusion.

In light of the Troubled Waters flap, he told Levine, "I want to be able to trust the U is protecting academic freedom."

Levine said:

A policy is in place. But something broke down at some level. We're having deep discussion. The faculty won't leave this alone.

He still didn't give specifics, however.

After the hearing, he would not tell me who originally saw the film or what specific concerns they had -- which is really the core of the issue behind why the film was originally pulled.

"I can't speak for everyone," he said.