Severe thunderstorm and tornado warnings issued for Twin Cities metro area

MPR News helps you turn down the noise and build shared understanding. Turn up your support for this public resource and keep trusted journalism accessible to all. 

Turn Up Your Support

A federal appeals court on Friday resurrected 

, who argue that their objection to filming same-sex weddings should be protected under First Amendment rights of free speech and freedom of religion.

Carl and Angel Larsen own a media production company in St. Cloud. In 2016, they sued the state of Minnesota, claiming a state law prohibiting discrimination conflicts with their personal religious views.

A district court judge dismissed their case in 2017. But the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals 

reinstated the lawsuit’s claims of free speech

Jeremy Tedesco, an attorney with the Alliance Defending Freedom, represented the Larsens. He called the decision a “significant win.”

“The government shouldn’t have the power to force people to force people to express messages that violate their beliefs regardless of what their beliefs are,” Tedesco said. “This is a protection that’s good for the Larsens and protects them from being forced to express messages that violate their religious convictions. But it protects everyone as well."

The appeals court sent the case back to the lower court to decide whether to grant the Larsens a preliminary injunction.

Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison, whose office defended the law, condemned the court decision, saying it “marks a shocking reversal of Minnesota’s evolution toward equality for LGBTQ people.”

“With this perversion of the First Amendment, the majority sanctions a policy of ‘No gays allowed,’” Ellison said in a statement Friday. “A ruling that lets a business discriminate against LGBTQ folks today would let it discriminate on the basis of religion, race, gender, ability, or any other category it chooses tomorrow.” 

The Minnesota Department of Human Rights 

 that the act of refusing service to same-sex couples can be seen as discrimination.

In a statement, the department said it’s “deeply disappointed” by the split decision. 

“Minnesota is not in the business of creating second-class community members in our state,” said Department Commissioner Rebecca Lucero. “Time and again, Minnesotans have chosen love and inclusion in our communities in order to build a state where our laws lift up our beautiful and complex identities, not hold them down.”

The Human Rights Department said it’s working with the Attorney General’s Office to explore all legal options.

Minnesota News

Crime, Law and Justice

Courts

Kirsti Marohn

Author

A federal appeals court on Friday resurrected a lawsuit by two Minnesota filmmakers, who argue that their objection to filming same-sex weddings should be protected under First Amendment rights of free speech and freedom of religion.

Supporters for Angel and Carl Larsen gather outside courthouse.

Court: Suit by St. Cloud couple opposed to filming same-sex weddings can continue

Go Deeper.

Like this?