Huge 2020 DFL money edge couldn’t tip Capitol control
Amid record-shattering campaign spending, Democrats outspent Republicans more than 2 to 1 in last year’s battle for total control of the Minnesota Legislature — but came up short, as dozens of DFL candidates lost in November despite a financial advantage.
Overall, Democratic candidates and outside groups spent more than $16 million in their unsuccessful battle to take over the Senate from Republicans, who spent just $7.7 million defending their majority, according to final campaign reports released Tuesday.
In the House of Representatives, Democrats maintained their majority but lost seats, despite spending $9.1 million to Republicans’ $4.5 million.
In general, the candidate with more money spent on their behalf tended to win, in either party. But it’s the exceptions that decided the razor-close battle for the state Senate.
Create a More Connected Minnesota
MPR News is your trusted resource for the news you need. With your support, MPR News brings accessible, courageous journalism and authentic conversation to everyone - free of paywalls and barriers. Your gift makes a difference.
There were 13 different Senate districts where Democrats outspent Republicans — including spending by outside groups — but lost. In contrast, there were only two races where Republicans spent more than Democrats but lost.
This held true in almost all of the most hotly contested races of the election cycle. Democrats outspent Republicans in all nine of the most expensive Senate races of 2020, often by huge margins. But they only won two of those nine races.
Most of those seats were held by Republican incumbents, and incumbents often have an edge since their voters already know them. But despite this, Democrats had high hopes before the November election that they would retake the Minnesota Senate.
Winning just one more seat would have given DFL candidates majority control over the Senate. It’s unclear whether two DFL senators who left the DFL caucus soon after the election would have still done so if Democrats were going to be the new majority party.
A similar story was the case in the House of Representatives, with the only difference that Democrats already had control there due to their 2018 wave, and were able to maintain their majority despite losing some close races.
In fact, though in general winning candidates tend to outspend their opponents, a majority of the victorious House Republican candidates were outspent, in what House Minority Leader Kurt Daudt, R-Crown, called a “tidal wave of Democrat money.”
All told, nearly $18 million was spent backing losing candidates for the state Legislature in the 2020 general election — more than $10 million of that on behalf of unsuccessful Democratic Senate candidates. That $18 million is almost as much as the $19.1 million spent backing winning candidates last year.
A majority of that money didn’t come from the legislative candidates themselves, who are subject to fairly strict campaign finance regulations. As has been the case for many years, a majority of the spending in 2020 came from outside groups, which includes political parties and a range of interest groups and advocacy organizations.
These outside groups combined to spend more than $25 million on Minnesota races, versus less than $12 million for all candidates combined.
And all that money broke a number of records. Before 2020, Minnesota had never seen a single race with more than $2 million in total spending. In 2020, there were four such races, as well as four more million-dollar races.
The money chase is already on for 2022.
Gov. Tim Walz, a first-term Democrat who hasn’t formally launched a reelection bid, entered the year with $1.3 million in the bank. His campaign said he raised another $550,000 in January. That makes him better positioned than the last two incumbents at this point in their initial term — both went on to win again.
No Republicans have announced a challenge or formed a committee that would allow them to raise money toward a run.