Cooler but still well above normal this week

MPR News helps you turn down the noise and build shared understanding. Turn up your support for this public resource and keep trusted journalism accessible to all. 

Turn Up Your Support

Folks in this Mississippi River town hope a new federal program can revive the optimism engraved long ago in a plaque on the side of their hospital.

"Dedicated to the Future of Health Care in the Tri-State Area," the sign declares. "May 11, 1981."

More recent placards posted at the facility's entryways are ominous, however. "Closed," they say. "No Trespassing."

The Keokuk hospital, which served rural areas of Iowa, Illinois, and Missouri, closed in October 2022. But new owners plan to reopen the hospital with the help of a new federal payment system. The Rural Emergency Hospital program guarantees hospitals extra cash if they provide emergency and outpatient services but end inpatient care.

"We've been without a hospital for over a year — and I don't think anybody in Keokuk or the surrounding areas will be picky in any way, shape, or form," says Kathie Mahoney, mayor of the town of about 9,800 people. She says residents would prefer to have a full-service hospital with inpatient beds, even though those types of beds had been used sparingly in recent years.

The revival of the Keokuk hospital would mark a small victory in the nationwide struggle to save rural hospitals, which continue to close due to staffing shortages, low reimbursement rates, and declining patient numbers. The new federal program, which went into effect in January 2023, is meant to stem the closures. But there have been growing pains, says George Pink, deputy director of the North Carolina Rural Health Research Program, which tracks hospital closures and conversions.

Just 18 of the more than 1,700 eligible rural hospitals nationwide have applied for and won the new designation. Many hospitals are reluctant to give up inpatient services entirely, and some are concerned about how other payment streams could be affected, rural health leaders say. The new designation's unclear definition of "rural" has also caused confusion.

"We are still in an era of rural hospital closures," Pink says. Nine hospitals closed in 2023, and that number could rise in 2024, he says. An influx of federal relief funds during the pandemic kept struggling hospitals afloat, but now that money is largely gone.

The Rural Emergency Hospital program is the first new federal payment model for hospitals since 1997. Dr. Dora Hughes, acting chief medical officer of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, says the new model's criteria are outlined by statute and "hospitals should consider specific circumstances before making the decision to apply."

The federal agency is providing outreach to rural communities and welcomes feedback, Hughes wrote in an email to KFF Health News. 

Now, rural health leaders and federal lawmakers are working quickly to tweak the new program to attract more applicants, says Carrie Cochran-McClain, chief policy officer of the National Rural Health Association.

Currently, facilities that convert to rural emergency hospitals receive a 5% increase in Medicare payments, plus an average annual payment of about $3.2 million, in exchange for giving up their expensive inpatient beds and focusing solely on emergency and outpatient care. Rural hospitals with no more than 50 beds, like Keokuk's, that closed after the law was signed 

, are eligible to apply for the program and reopen with emergency and outpatient services.

More than 100 rural hospitals nationwide have inquired about converting, says Janice Walters, interim executive director for the Rural Health Redesign Center, which has a federal grant to provide technical assistance to hospitals that want to apply.

But only about a quarter of those inquiries are likely to become a rural emergency hospital, and persuading more troubled hospitals to make the leap would require regulators to make changes, Walters says.

Her advice? "Give them 10 beds to just take care of their community."

In a journal article published last year, Dr. Sara Schaefer, a surgeon, worries about the unintended consequences of getting rid of rural inpatient beds. Schaefer, who spent six months of medical school at a small rural Idaho hospital, says she saw firsthand how difficult it was for the hospital to transfer patients to bigger facilities, which were often too full to take them.

"There has to be a better way," says Schaefer, who is also a research fellow at the Center for Healthcare Outcomes & Policy at the University of Michigan.

The rural health association's Cochran-McClain says lawmakers are considering changes that could allow the hospitals to:

Updates to the law could affect communities nationwide. In Fort Scott, Kansas, where the hospital closed in late 2018, Mayor Matthew Wells says the community wants the eligibility date pushed back. U.S. Sen. Jerry Moran (R-Kan.) introduced a bill in Decemsber that, if passed, would push eligibility back to 2015.

"This is a matter of life and death to my community," Wells says. "I see a clear path, but the federal regulations in particular make that path nearly impossible."

In Holly Springs, Mississippi, hospital chief executive Dr. Kenneth Williams says he doesn't understand the federal definition of "rural." His hospital, Alliance Healthcare Hospital, was one of the first to win the new Rural Emergency Hospital designation in early 2023. He laid off staff and shut down his inpatient beds. Then, CMS officials called to tell him they had made a mistake.

"And I said, 'Wait a minute,'" Williams says. The hospital, which is about an hour south of Memphis, Tennessee, doesn't meet the current criteria of rural, they told him. Williams, an internal medicine doctor, bought the hospital in 1999 and has been trying to keep it running since.

Federal regulators are now asking Williams to convert the facility into another type of Medicare payment model, such as the sole community hospital with inpatient beds that it was before. Williams says that would be difficult: "What kind of transition can I make, especially with reduced services?"

In Keokuk, the hospital fits the current requirements. Insight Health Group, the Michigan company 

 last March, plans to apply for the new federal designation as soon as it obtains state permits under 

 tailored to rural emergency hospitals. It would be the first such hospital in the state.

Like many other rural hospitals struggling to survive, Keokuk's shuttered several key departments years ago, including its maternity and inpatient psychiatric units. In 2021, the last full year it was open, the hospital averaged fewer than three inpatients per night, according to 

data posted by the Iowa Hospital Association

More than half of the three-story building would remain mothballed if the facility reopened under the new designation, but the emergency department could serve patients again as soon as late summer, says Atif Bawahab, Insight's chief strategy officer.

Bruce Mackie has worked 32 years at the hospital, including 10 years as director of plant operations. The new owners kept him on to watch over the building. Beds, high-tech scanners, and lab equipment remain, but most of the clocks have stopped. "It's spooky," he says.

Even if the services are more limited than before, Mackie says, "everybody wants the hospital to reopen. This city needs an ER."

, formerly known as Kaiser Health News (KHN), is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues and is one of the core operating programs at 

 — the independent source for health policy research, polling, and journalism.

Health

Homepage

Sarah Jane Tribble

Author

Tony Leys

Just 18 facilities were converted into Rural Emergency Hospitals so far. Advocates and lawmakers say tweaks to the law are needed to widen the reach and keep health care in rural communities. 

Federal fix for rural hospitals gets few takers so far

Go Deeper.

Like this?

News you can use in your inbox