Severe thunderstorm and tornado warnings issued for Twin Cities metro area

MPR News helps you turn down the noise and build shared understanding. Turn up your support for this public resource and keep trusted journalism accessible to all. 

Turn Up Your Support

A court battle over treaty rights is heating up in northern Minnesota. 

 after gillnetting fish and gathering wild rice without a required state permit on land that is not part of a reservation. The state's longtime position has been that it's illegal to harvest wild rice without a license on off-reservation land. Gillnetting without a permit is a gross misdemeanor.

The tribe members hope the charges against them will open the DNR to a court battle that could clarify treaty rights, and reaffirm hunting and gathering rights they believe were guaranteed by a treaty signed more than 150 years ago. 

History, language blur treaty disputes

The outcome could affect hunting and fishing across much of northern Minnesota, but most Minnesotans won't really understand what's going on, said University of Minnesota Duluth professor and treaty historian Erik Redix.

"People know very little about treaties," he said. 

 was signed over to the U.S. government in a series of a dozen treaties over about three decades in the mid-1800s. Tribes ceded the land in exchange for payments, reservations and certain rights. 

The treaties themselves are old, complex, and handled differently than any other legal document.  

Each of the dozen land cession treaties is a little different — promising different things, and sparking different controversies.

In recent years, treaty conflicts have focused on land use rights, with tribe members asserting the right to hunt, fish and gather on ceded lands and with traditional techniques prohibited by state law. 

Three of the state's most important — and most controversial — treaties were made in 

https://www.google.com/fusiontables/embedviz?q=select+col0+from+1d6T-3V6WI7nI7ZPKILi1JG-FgPGrBWOrYSvigvxF&viz=MAP&h=false&lat=46.26131185687088&lng=-93.41046331443755&t=1&z=6&l=col0&y=2&tmplt=2&hml=GEOCODABLE

In 1837, Ojibwe and Dakota leaders signed over a massive swath of what is now east-central Minnesota and western Wisconsin to the U.S. government. 

1837 Treaty with the Ojibwe

1837 Treaty with the Dakota

The land ceded by the Ojibwe included Mille Lacs Lake, one of Minnesota's most famous fisheries. At the time, though, the U.S. government was more interested in logging off the white pine that ran through Wisconsin to the eastern banks of the Mississippi.  

"Those trees built the expansion of this country," said Redix. 

In exchange for millions of acres of land, Ojibwe tribes were promised payments of $35,000 each year for 20 years. The payments were split among cash and a long list of goods and services, including food, blacksmith shops and a yearly ration of $500 worth of tobacco.  

The tribes were also granted the right to hunt, fish and gather on the ceded land — a pivotal line in a 

The treaty grants tribes the right to hunt, fish and gather on ceded lands, but the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources instead have enforced Minnesota law, arresting tribe members for gillnetting and spearfishing outside the bounds of state regulations.

Ojibwe exercising rights in 1837 treaty

Treaty rights coverage

In 1990, the Mille Lacs Band of Ojibwe sued for the rights granted them under the 1837 treaty. For the next decade, they fought a legal battle that reached the U.S. Supreme Court. Tribe members were arrested during 

. Even now, as walleye numbers decline on Lake Mille Lacs, tensions remain between tribe members and anglers. 

Minnesota v. Mille Lacs Band of Chippewa Indians

In 1999 the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed tribal fishing rights on ceded land. Since then, state and band officials split management of the Mille Lacs fishery. Tribe members are 

allowed to gillnet a limited amount of fish each year

The Mille Lacs treaty rights case

https://www.google.com/fusiontables/embedviz?q=select+col0+from+1uoEPBCKMxWYzwBfLTBQMm9VbdPtZkCuJVc4wYOO-&viz=MAP&h=false&lat=47.247314777540055&lng=-91.67462347068755&t=1&z=6&l=col0&y=2&tmplt=2&hml=KML


The 1854 treaty ceded the lands in Minnesota's Arrowhead region. At the time, the U.S. government wanted to mine a vein of copper on the northern shore of Lake Superior.

1854 Treaty

Many of the same tribal leaders who signed the 1837 treaty, including well-known Chief Hole-in-the-Day, made their way to La Pointe, Wis., to negotiate the 1854 treaty. 

But a lot had changed in those 17 years. 

Treaties themselves were more complex by 1854, with detailed plans for one-time and annual payments. The 1854 treaty also established permanent reservations for the 

In exchange for giving up more than 2 million acres of land, the bands received yearly payments of less than $20,000, split among cash, goods, agricultural supplies and school funds. They also received a number of one-time payments to help them resettle on reservation land.

As with the 1837 treaty, tribes were also granted rights to hunt, fish and gather on the ceded land.

Ojibwe tribes that lived on the 1854 ceded lands made their move to establish hunting rights a few years before tribal anglers staged protests on Mille Lacs. 

Their effort began in 1984, when Grand Portage member Curtis Gagnon shot a moose in the woods near the edge of the reservation. He tracked the animal off reservation through a portion of ceded land. Gagnon lost the moose, but decided to assert his hunting rights under the 1854 treaty.

Grand Portage v. Minnesota memorandum of agreement

He turned himself in to the DNR. The Grand Portage, Fond du Lac and Bois Forte Bands joined him in a lawsuit, seeking affirmation of treaty rights from a federal court. Before that happened, the bands 

, trading some of their rights for yearly payments of over $1.5 million to each band. 

established their own hunting and fishing regulations

, avoiding some of the more controversial techniques, such as spearfishing and gillnetting. 

Fond du Lac later backed out of the agreement, but still enforces hunting and fishing regulations.

https://www.google.com/fusiontables/embedviz?q=select+col0+from+14OvSE-zMVXqeX-r6qfiYFZqCzaKTN8OCT4LYyvwL&viz=MAP&h=false&lat=46.57373617147148&lng=-93.77575872459379&t=1&z=6&l=col0&y=2&tmplt=2&hml=KML

Previous treaties were negotiated on or near the land in question, but tribal leaders had to travel to Washington, D.C., to sign the 1855 Treaty.

1855 Treaty

This time, the U.S. government wanted access to logging and mining opportunities across the bulk of north-central Minnesota. Negotiators also made an attempt to push tribes toward an agricultural lifestyle. 


In addition to $20,000 in annual payments, the treaty established the Mille Lacs and Leech Lake reservations and promised to provide equipment and skilled labor to plow land for each tribe. 

But one line is conspicuously missing from the 1855 treaty. Both the 1837 and 1854 documents give tribe members the right to hunt and fish on ceded land. The 1855 treaty does not explicitly grant those rights. 

But tribe members depended on the land for sustenance, especially during the lean years of the Great Depression and World War II. They continued to hunt, fish and gather across the region. 


Those efforts began to clash with the state's ramped-up management of its natural resources.


In August 2015, a group of tribe members from across the 1855 ceded lands met at Hole-in-the-Day Lake near Nisswa, Minn., to harvest wild rice in an attempt to strengthen hunting and gathering rights under the 1855 Treaty. 

Ojibwe rice harvest is latest test of treaty limits in Minnesota

DNR cites tribal members in second day of treaty rights challenge

Four were cited under state law for gillnetting and harvesting wild rice without a permit. Early this year they were 

Their plan, according to White Earth member and attorney Frank Bibeau, is to affirm tribal land use rights through a series of court appeals. 

It's not clear how the legal process will move forward. The tribes could reach a settlement with the state, like the Grand Portage and Bois Forte Bands did nearly 30 years ago. 

The case could also reach the U.S. Supreme Court, as the Mille Lacs Band case did in 1999. 

Either way, the decision will have broad implications. Many of Minnesota's best fishing lakes fall within 1855 ceded lands. It could also allow — or discourage — other tribes across the country from asserting their treaty rights.

Map: The 1837, 1854 and 1855 treaties with the Ojibwe

https://www.google.com/fusiontables/embedviz?q=select+col0+from+1QFi_BS_CsBaJ_7mpJkehnrJevMytcgxoduPNZ4aI&viz=MAP&h=false&lat=46.37702274486214&lng=-91.34778020896876&t=1&z=6&l=col0&y=2&tmplt=2&hml=KML

Environmental News

Politics and Government News

Social Issues

Shows

All Things Considered

Morning Edition

NewsPartners

John Enger

Author

Much of what is now Minnesota land was ceded by Ojibwe tribes in a series of treaties. Three of those treaties have sparked land use controversies in recent years.

Explaining Minnesota's 1837, 1854 and 1855 Ojibwe treaties

Go Deeper.

Like this?