Minnesota budget projected surplus at $2.4 billion, but warning lights blinking
Go Deeper.
Create an account or log in to save stories.
Like this?
Thanks for liking this story! We have added it to a list of your favorite stories.
Updated 5:12 p.m.
Minnesota’s projected budget surplus was pegged at $2.4 billion in a new report Wednesday from the state finance agency, which also raised concerns about patterns down the line.
The financial forecast suggests Minnesota’s economy continues to chug along in the near term but could face strains in the years ahead.
“Minnesota’s budget and economic outlook remains stable in the current biennium, but a significant structural imbalance constrains the budget outlook” for the next budget that begins in July 2025, officials wrote.
“We are on strong footing. Our sound fiscal policy and planning has led to achieving our largest budget reserve to date, which is evidence of strong fiscal management,” said Minnesota Management and Budget Commissioner Erin Campbell. “It’s important that we maintain that strong fiscal management going forward.”
Turn Up Your Support
MPR News helps you turn down the noise and build shared understanding. Turn up your support for this public resource and keep trusted journalism accessible to all.
The report sets up another tug-of-war over how to divvy up the funds. Lawmakers approved a new two-year budget in May, aided by another big surplus.
“We need to be measured in how we approach this,” Gov. Tim Walz told reporters Wednesday before defending DFL spending decisions last session as vital investments in Minnesota's future and for the well-being of school children. “If we’re cautious on this, we balance out in the out years.”
Walz encouraged lawmakers and interest groups to level their expectations in 2024. He said the Legislature should focus on a bonding bill and triage other issues that might require funding.
Among the unexpected short-term challenges, the report noted that the state’s decision earlier this year to pick up more costs around school breakfasts and lunches regardless of a family's income has turned out to be much more expensive than initially expected.
The program was slated to cost about $400 million over two years, but the forecast indicates it will be about $80 million more expensive due to costs of food and lower federal participation in the meals program than officials had anticipated.
Demand for disability waiver services — which let people access cares at home — was also higher than projected. Cost for services also outpaced prior forecasts.
Walz added that he expects to put forward only limited budgetary measures next year.
‘Need to be very thoughtful’
Revenue updates in recent months had offered clues that a major surplus was building. An October report showed the state would bring in roughly $2.4 billion more than anticipated — driven by higher collections of taxes and fees.
Some of that excess will automatically be added to the state’s rainy day fund, which currently sits at more than $2.85 billion. A report released by Minnesota Management and Budget in October recommended a slightly higher level.
The remainder is up for grabs as lawmakers return to St. Paul in February. The DFL-led Legislature passed a $72 billion two-year budget earlier this year. Lawmakers are expected to tackle a supplemental budget bill and construction projects bill in 2024.
Democratic leaders didn’t shut the door on new spending items, noting that some Minnesotans still have needs like child care expenses, but they agreed with Walz that restraint is best.
“We’ll be having that conversation, because as the economy continues to grow, we have record employment, we have low unemployment, some people are still struggling,” said Senate Majority Leader Kari Dziedzic, DFL-Minneapolis. “And so how do we help lift everybody up?”
They also pointed to programs that they approved last year that haven’t been fully rolled out yet. They predicted Minnesotans would see the benefits of those soon. They were hopeful that the ripple effect could boost the economy and paint a sunnier picture at the next forecast in February.
Democrats left cash aside last year for a capital investment bill in case Republicans won’t support one, House Speaker Melissa Hortman, DFL-Brooklyn Park said ahead of the Wednesday presentation. The state requires a higher threshold of support to take on debt, which means that Democrats need GOP buy-in to issue bonds to pay for projects.
“If there is bipartisan cooperation, we would see a bonding bill in the nature of $1.7 billion or so,” Hortman said. “And if it is Democrats only that would like to do a bonding bill, then we'll have a state bonding bill in the neighborhood of $800 million.”
After historic state spending last year, Republican leaders said the Legislature should focus on getting more money back to taxpayers.
House Minority Leader Lisa Demuth, R-Cold Spring, on Wednesday said DFL lawmakers “squandered” the chance to send the $17.5 billion budget surplus posted in February back to Minnesotans as tax cuts.
“Democrats’ reckless spending has now set us on the path to have a budget deficit in the coming years. This could have been avoided if Democrats had even an ounce of fiscal responsibility,” Demuth said in a statement. “Democrats put their insatiable appetite for spending ahead of the needs of Minnesotans and we will all be paying for their fiscal insanity for years to come.”
Other GOP leaders said that likely took ongoing tax relief off the table for now.
“Spending is expected to exceed revenues to deficit, my friends, and so that's what we have to get a handle on,” state Rep. Kristin Robbins, R-Maple Grove, said.
Campbell offered a cautionary view on the long-term forecast, noting that projected spending and inflation calculations show the state's surplus down to only $82 million at the end of fiscal 2027.
That’s a balance that “provides little cushion when you consider the size of our projected state budget,” she told reporters. “Such a small balance, together with a structural imbalance, suggests policymakers will need to be very thoughtful when making budget decisions this next year.”
